Bertrand Russell – The Impact of Science on Society

An intellectual aristocrat, Russell is important because of the ideas he put down in writing which would go on to influence modern globalists and the policy they create for the masses.  In short Bertrand Russell was a thinker for the New World Order, an idea that his family had been dedicated to for who knows exactly how long.

The Impact of Science on Society

The topic of this video is specifically one of his short books that has been cited and sourced by conspiracy researchers before called “The Impact of Science on Society”.  

In this work Russell takes us on a journey through the mind of the globalists and where they would like to see society go.  With an emphasis on the effects and impacts that science has and will have on culture, philosophy, and freedom.

The overall thrust of the book depends upon the indoctrination of the masses using science as a credible conduit to a world socialist/communist dictatorship ultimately ruled by an aristocratic elite who have summarily subdued the masses, taken away all rights and freedoms and replaced them with a totalitarian rule.  In a word, the New World Order.

I have a link in the description of this video to the book if you would like to download it and read it for yourself.  I highly recommend you do, but I will be giving a few quotes from it. All other sources will be cited in the description as well.

Scientific Worldview

On page 6 Russell lays out the basis of the scientific worldview:

“Out of the work of the great men of the seventeenth century a new outlook on the world was developed, and it was this outlook, not specific arguments, which brought about the decay of the belief in portents, witchcraft, demonic possession, and so forth.  I think there were three ingredients in the scientific outlook of the eighteenth century that were specially important:

  • Statements of fact should be based on observation, not on unsupported authority.
  • The inanimate world is self-acting, self-perpetuating system, in which all changes conform to natural laws.
  • The earth is not the center of the universe, and probably Man is not its purpose (if any); moreover, “purpose” is a concept which is scientifically useless.”

So in 1 he tells us to deny any supposed revelation of deity, in number 2 he declares that naturalism is the scientific view, and in #3 he advocates stark nihilism as the mature scientific perspective.  The thought that humans have inherent purpose is childish and should be tossed into the respective dustbin of history.

Regarding the philosophy of science or the philosophy that an affinity with science may encourage Russell states on page 77:

“The Philosophy which has seemed appropriate to science has varied from time to time.  To Newton and most of his English contemporaries science seemed to afford proof of the existence of God as the Almighty Lawgiver: he had decreed the law of gravitation and whatever other natural laws had been discovered by Englishmen.  In spite of Copernicus, man was still the moral center of the universe, and God’s purpose were mainly concerned with the human race. The more radical among the French philosophers, being politically in conflict with the Church, took a different view.  They did not admit the laws imply a lawgiver; on the other hand they thought that physical laws could explain the human behavior. This led them to materialism and denial of free will. In their view, the universe has no purpose and man in an insignificant episode.  The vastness of the universe impressed them and inspired in them a new form of humility to replace that which atheism had made obsolete. This point of view is well expressed in a little poem by leopardi and expresses, more nearly that any other known to me, my own feeling about the universe and human passions:

The Infinite

Dear to me always was this lonely hill

And this hedge that excludes so large a part

Of the ultimate horizen from my view

But as i sit and gaze, my thought conceives

Interminable vastness of space

Beyond it, and unearthly silences,

And profoundest calm’ wherat my heart almost

Becomes dismayed.  And as I hear the wind

Blustering through these branches, I find myself

Comparing with this sound that infinite silence;

And the I call to mind eternity,

And the ages that are dead, and this that now

Is living, and the noise of it. And so

In this immensity my thought sinks drowned:

And sweet it seems to shipwreck in this sea.”

It’s clear that Russells view is that humans are meaningless and unimportant to the higher order of the “Universe”.  The reason this philosophy is so important to the New World Order is many but a few examples would be:

  1. Instill nihilism and hopelessness
  2. Make people not believe in God therefore making it very easy to take away God given rights

As Russell states on page 79

“Philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways, but the real task is to alter it.  From the point of view of technical philosophy, this theory has been best developed by John Dewey, who is universally acknowledged as America’s most eminent philosopher.  

This philosophy has two aspects, one theoretical and the other ethical.  An the theoretical side, it analyzes away the concept “truth,” for which it substitutes “utility.”  It used to be thought that, if you believed Caesar crossed the Rubicon, you believed truly, because Caesar did cross the Rubicon.  Not so, say the philosopher’s we are considering: to say that your belief is “true” is another way of saying you will find it more profitable that the opposite belief.”

And so there it is the so-called prestigious philosophers like John Dewey turning something noble and glorious like “truth” into something as cold and sterile as  mere “utility”. In other words, whatever works, whatever gets the job done. What’s true today might not be true tomorrow, the true essence of science, Utilitarianism, or Pragmatism.

In another one of Russell’s works called “The Scientific Outlook” on page 77 he admits the nature of science and the scientific method:

“Induction-All inductive arguments in the last resort reduce themselves to the following form: “If this is true, that is true: now that is true, therefore this is true.”  This argument is, of course, formally fallacious. Suppose I were to say: “If bread is a stone and stones are nourishing, then this bread will nourish me; now this bread does nourish me; therefore it is a stone, and stones are nourishing.”  If I were to advance such an argument, I should certainly be thought foolish, yet it would not be fundamentally different from the arguments upon which all scientific laws are based.”

On page 89 of Impact of Science on Society Russell states:

“And it is part of the scientific attitude that the pronouncements of science do not claim to be certain, but only to be the most probable on present evidence.”

In his work called “History of Western Philosophy” speaking as a mathematician he admits about the nature of numbers on pages 156-157:

“Thus numbers are, in a certain precise sense, formal.  The facts which verify various propositions asserting that various collections each have two members, have in common, not a constituent, but a form.  In this they differ from propositions about the Statue of Liberty, or the moon, or George Washington. Such propositions refer to a particular portion of space-time; it is this that is in common between all the statements that can be made about the Statue of Liberty.  But there is nothing in common among propositions “there are two so and so’s” except a common form. The relation of the symbol ‘two’ to the meaning of a proposition in which it occurs is for more complicated that the relation of the symbol ‘red’ to the meaning of a proposition in which it occurs.  We may say, in a certain sense, that the symbol ‘two’ means nothing, for, when it occurs in a true statement there is no corresponding constituent in the meaning of the statement. We may continue, if we like, to say that numbers are eternal, immutable, and so on, but we must add that they are logical fictions.”

Basically what he is saying is that numbers are symbols of what they are attempting to represent, mathematics can do amazing things but it has limitations in the sense that it can’t truly represent reality.  Many things we call scientific, if the numbers and theories that make them up are based off of mere fictions and abstractions how sure can we be that it can always be credible? Perhaps a scientific society isn’t as rational or objective as it sounds.

Tyranny and Science

On page 46 he talks about how great science has been for tyrants.

“People still shudder at the enormities of men like Caligula and Nero, but their misdeeds fade into insignificance beside those of modern tyrants.  Except among the upper classes in Rome, daily life was much as usual even under the worst emperors. Caligula wished his enemies has but a single head; how he would have envied Hitler the scientific chambers of Auschwitz!  Nero did his best to establish a spy system which would smell out traitors, but a conspiracy defeated him in the end. If he had been defeated by the N.K.V.D. he might have died in his bed at ripe old age. These are a few of the blessings that science has bestowed on tyrants.”

Reminds me of the Werhner von Braun quote:

“Science does not have a moral dimenstion, it is like a knife.  If you give it to a surgeon or murderer, each will use it differently.”

To be clear, I’m all about science, however, the aristocracy is in total control of it and they aim to use it’s doctrines to brainwash us and use it’s discoverys to control us, we have to be aware of this.

Scientific Dictatorship

Speaking of failed dictatorships, on page 50 Russell states

“In future such failures are not likely to occur where there is dictatorship.  Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.  Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves to happy, because the government will tell them they are so.”

This book was published in the 50’s and it’s clear that what Russell is saying has since come to pass.  The food we eat is controlled by just a few corporations all which are tied into the aristocracy. They poison us through diet and they poison our tap water with hormones, fecal waste, and fluoride.  They set up regulatory agencies like the FDA (Food, and Drug Administration) to make sure everything that is OK’d by them is sure to harm us and poison us, submitting us to their medical inquisition. It’s clear what they prefer to use science and it’s many wonderful advancements for.

Some of what Russell advocates for in the book borders on transhumanism, on page 28 he states:

“When such methods of modifying the congenital character of animals and plants have been pursued long enough to make their success obvious, it is probable that there will be a powerful movement for applying scientific methods to human propagation.  There would at first be strong religious and emotional obstacles to the adoption of such policy. But suppose Russia were able to overcome these obstacles and to breed a race stronger, more intelligent, and more resistant to disease that any race of men that has hitherto existed, and suppose the other nations perceived that unless they follow suit they would be defeated in war, then either they other nations would voluntarily forgo their prejudices, or, after defeat, they would be compelled to forgo them.”

Russell is sure that if humans aren’t controlled completely by a World government that we will surely destroy each other because of the power that science will give us because we the ‘useless eaters’ are incompetent and can’t direct their own lives especially with added responsibility.   

On page 76 of his work he states:

“But if human life is to continue in spite of science, mankind will have to learn a discipline of the passions which, in the past, has not been necessary.  Men will have to submit to the law, even when they think the law unjust and iniquitous. Nations which are persuaded that they are only demanding the barest justice will have to acquiesce when this demand is denied them by the neutral authority.  I do not say that this is easy; I do not prophecy that it will happen; I say only that if it does not happen the human race will perish, and will perish a result of science.”

If you think about it science has been responsible for insurmountable pain, death and suffering.  The scientific advancements of the early 20th century resulted whole new types of warfare such as biological: mustard gas, zyklon B, and napalm; and air warfare: planes flying above and bombing out entire cities and villages.  It’s obvious that the aristocracy have used these advancements to their benefit in relation to commerce and culling the population which Russell has been a very open advocate of in this and other writings.

The answer in Russells mind is an all encompassing World Government.  On page 26 he says:

“Since war is likely to become more destructive of human life than it has been in recent centuries, unification under a single government is probably necessary unless we are to acquiesce in either a return to barbarism or the extinction of the human race.”

The forked tongued Russell also admits that war is the reason for the massive modern State on page 63:

“It is mainly war that has caused the excessive power of modern States, and until the fear of war is removed it is inevitable that everything should be subordinated to short-term efficiency.”

In the early 20th century with the presidency of Woodrow Wilson, he being our first Progressive president, there was a massive leftist movement that continues to this day called the progressive movement.

Referring to The early 20th century politics Russell states on pg 45

“…many progressives were taken in by an argument for a new kind of oligarchy. ‘We the progressives’ so runs the argument ‘are the wise and good; we know what reforms the worlds needs; if we have power, we shall create a paradise.’ And so. Narcissistically hypnotized by contemplation of their own wisdom and goodness, they proceeded to create a new tyranny, more drastic that an previously known.”

And propagandizing people into supporting scientific dictatorship with the sly mind control of labels Russell states on page 44:

“A scientific oligarchy, accordingly, is bound to become what is called “totalitarian,” that is to say, all important forms of power will become a monopoly of the State. This monolithic system has sufficient merits to be attractive to many people, but to my mind its demerits are far greater than its merits.  For some reason which I have failed to understand, many people like the system when it is Russian but disliked the very same system when it was German. I am compelled to think that this is due to the power of labels; these people like whatever is labeled “left” without examining whether the label has any justification.”

One of the other ways which Russell advocates in his book is the use of educational propaganda, on page 103 he states:

“The Nations which at present increase rapidly should be encouraged to adopt the methods by which, in the West, the increase of population has been checked.  Educational propaganda, with government help, could achieve this result in a generation. There are, however, two powerful forces opposed to such a policy: one is religion, the other is nationalism.  I think it is the duty of all who are capable of facing facts to realize, and to proclaim, that opposition to the spread of birth control, if successful, must inflict upon mankind the most appalling depth of misery and degradation, and that within athoner fifty years or so.”


It’s clear that Russell and other globalist thinkers have a common agenda and goal.  The aristocracy that run the think tanks and governments have a disdain for we the people the ‘useless eaters’.  They believe it’s better to poison us, dumb us down, subject us to corporate and financial servitude, unbeknownst to us and lead us like lamb to the slaughter to a New World Order.  Ultimately resulting in a reduction of the population by at least 90%, probably more like 95% as a result of endless war, violence, drug abuse, medical inquisition, stress, disease, inoculations, vaccinations, and sterilization.

These people need to be exposed and their globalist doctrines completely rejected.  This is not a left/right issue, you have to step out of the dialectic to understand this completely. I encourage you to check out a couple more documents that will help you understand the aristocracies plans for you.

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

Changing Images of Man

The Scientific Outlook

History of Western Philosophy


Charlottesville Controversy – Bigger Picture

Government Fueled Race War

The liberal, local government in Charlottesville Virginia has created a lot of controversy earlier this year with their attempt to remove a historical statue of Civil War general Robert E. Lee.  The ‘Unite the Right’ event recently saw the vandalizing of some civil war statues by the so called ‘counter protesters’.  These protesters (white supremacists, Neo Nazis) and the counter protest groups started fighting and causing quite a scene resulting in up to 3 deaths and 34 injuries.

Mason lodge charlotessville
Widows Son Lodge No. 60 Charlottesville Free Masonic Lodge

These Masonic run governments are complicit and participant to this race war they are fueling.  Masonic directed and government buttressed groups such as Antifa, Black Lives Matter, Nazi’s, Communists, and the Alt-right as well as the Alt-left use the Hegelian Dialectic to further divide America in every single way possible to prepare for the coming calamities.

Political Correctness Off the Hook

Attempting to remove a historical statue, no matter it’s relevance in the name of social justice is just goofy but it’s a huge tactic of our Jesuit/Masonic rulers.  This is a mockery of the Southern people and their history, fueling the flames of the white nationalists and Neo-Nazi groups who probably have complete misunderstandings of what Robert E. Lee stands for to take up their tiki torches and go start Civil War II.

Robert E Lee
Why would we have a statue of a traitor to the Union on display anyway?

I find it very ironic that the Federal government has a statue of someone who was a traitor the their government displayed in the state of the Nations Capitol anyway.  As a matter of fact, Robert E. Lee was actually a villainous traitor to the South, there were many times he allowed the Yankee army off easy to fight another day for the ultimate surrender of the Confederacy.  Robert E. Lee was a papist traitor and supporter of building a bigger central government for the pope to easier control everyone, so really the liberals should support him as they love their centralized government.  EJP goes further into the traitorous Robert E. Lee here.

Trumps Statement

Even though Donald Trump has issued a seemingly heartfelt, not completely insincere statement condemning racism and racist groups and has continued to, the media continues to pump this whole race baiting narrative into our minds day after day (brainwashing).  No matter what Trump does or say the liberals are going to whine and complain and scream “RACIST” over and over.  There is a reason for this, folks.  Are you catching on?

Race War
Everything is racist

Jesuit trained Donald Trump (Fordham University) plays the white devil in the presidency after step n’ fetch it, toby for his white massas, Barry Davis Obama played the righteous and well spoken speech reader, egalitarian, sophisticated , black president.  The racial dichotomy has seriously been polarizing to a completely amazing level, just my opinion maybe.  The sex polarity is a whole other topic but when everyone expected Hillary Clinton to win the presidency (I did too LOL) but the white devil Trump did instead, then the Russia stuff, now more race stuff what can you expect?  If they can’t scream about “racism” they will definitely screech up a storm about “sexism”.  Did I mention that politics is basically all about race and sex now?  Oh, I did.  Ok, moving on….

Eric Jon Phelps Author Vatican Assassins

White Backlash

My boy, Eric Jon Phelps has been predicting this sort of racial backlash for many many years.  He maintains that this Jesuit controlled government has been working on fueling this racial integration and miscegenation through Civil Rights, pro-black anti-white (especially male) policies, affirmative action, re-education for white guilt, identity politics, and media propaganda which will eventually lead to a white backlash, a civil war, justifying martial law, use of FEMA camps as holding areas for trouble makers and ultimately leading to and justifying the implementation of a totalitarian Fascist style government.

The Real Fascist Threat

prescott Bush
Prescott Bush father of George H.W. Bush, Union Banking Corp., Nazi Funder (Skull & Bones)

A Fascist style take over has been attempted in our country before with the Bush-led Nazi Fascist coup to overthrow the current system.  Nazi’s infiltrated our government a long time ago right after World War II with Operation Paperclip. The biggest excuse for this is the threat of Russian Communism, however, Bolshevik Communism was completely controlled on the other side by the Jesuits so we know this explanation is bunk.  The real reason that Nazi’s were brought here was because the intelligence agencies of this world are not separate entities, they all work in unison on some level or another.

Reinhard gehlen
Knight of Malta, Nazi, Reinhard Gehlen

Knight of Malta Reinhard Gehlen was just like another one of the CIA boys when he was employed by our government.  He was a papal knight, a crusader for the pope, it mattered not what country or nationality he was, his work was for the pope to further establish the world intelligence community.

Jesuit-led Civil Rights Movement

Theodore Hesburgh.jpg
Father of the Civil Rights Movement Theodore Hesburgh S.J.

President Obama admits during a speech at Notre Dame that Jesuit Theodore Hesburgh is the man who led the Civil rights movement.  The Jesuits have mastered this form of false liberation, they’ve literally been at this for hundreds of years.  Check out the history about the Jesuit reductions in Paraguay where the native Indians were convinced to live in a sort of communism (The first real Communism) under the rule of the Jesuits therefore liberating from their former ‘wild’ life and into a more comfortable life.  The Jesuits did this with the best of intentions but eventually led to the mass slaughter and destruction of these native Indians.  The movie “The Mission” with Robert De Nero (Knight of Malta), depicts this ruination pretty well.

Roman Catholic Ultramontanism – Fascism

The true origin of Fascism is the Roman Catholic Church.  Ultramontanism is a doctrine of papal supremacy over temporal affairs.  In 1870 pope Pius IX established papal infallibility with help from Benito Mussolini pursuant to the Lateran Treaty of 1929 which set out a mile for Vatican City, the smallest sovereign country in the world.  Hitler and Mussolini are perfect examples of Fascist crusaders for the pope.  They were both devout Roman Catholics working to enforce the temporal power of the Roman Pontiff all over the world.


The Fascia is the universal symbol for Roman supremacy, here it is in Congress…

This is where you beloved Obama and Clinton and Bush all the rest of them tell us what’s up, right in between the old Roman symbol of total temporal domination.  It’s not a coincidence, folks.

Colorado Faesci
Here’s the ‘All Seeing Eye’ overseeing the Fascia ‘Temporal Power’ on Colorado’s seal…


Folks, if you’re worried about fascists stealing your rights away and subjecting you to traumatizing experiences, I can’ help but call out your ignorance.  Our government has, for all intents and purposes, been infiltrated by the very fascist style of government of which you claim to be so afraid of.  Donald Trump isn’t your enemy, folks.  Donald Trump is the same ol’ same ol’, his father was actually part of the KKK and I’m positive he’s a high mason but folks, every president has these kinds of connections, they wouldn’t be there unless they did.  The propaganda pushers and opinion makers out there want everyone to feel like the victim.  I’ll tell you the only time I ever hear anything about racism is when I have to hear about it on the news.  We need to wake up to the way our emotions our being manipulated with all this racial and sexual propaganda by our Jesuit overlords who love to see us at each others throats so they can declare marshal law.  Stay sharp, stay vigilant,  stay cool, I’m out.  Peace.



Evolutionism Refuted


The debate about the origins of everything has been raging for a very long time. But especially since the advent of the Theory of Evolution by Charles Darwin in 1859 with the publishing of his book “On the Origin of the Species..”. The Evolutionary world-view, sometimes called Naturalism, is mass inculcated in the way most people think about the world today. The idea of special creation by A special Creator is dismissed as preposterous and mocked as an intellectually inferior position. The loss of faith on a massive scale of the historicity and authenticity of the Mosaic Genesis Creation account have effected the way people view the entire Bible and questioning the very existence of God the creator. The modern Scientism paradigm is very damaging to many peoples faith in the Bible when their told science disproves the first passage of the Bible. (Gen 1:1 In the Beginning God created the Heaven and the earth). This video is intended to show the believers of scientism that their beloved Theory of Evolution is completely baseless, and ridiculous in light of the evidence. Furthermore, that it’s a complete abuse of the Scientific Method and to entertain in as a fact of life is very naive and unscientific.

Genesis 1: In the Beginning God created the Heaven and the earth,
The first chapter of the Bible may be hard to imagine but it’s not hard to understand, it’s as straight forward as it gets, no beating around the bush.
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep and the spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.
The account goes on to give details about the creation week and when read carefully and properly we are left with only being able to understand it literally.
The biblical creation story of Genesis chapter one is regarded by literary scholars as a written account of history. The text was written by Moses and Moses is regarded as one of the most authoritative writers of the Bible the Bible is considered the word of God. the Bible says God created everything in 6 days and rested on the 7th. This is the creationism position.

Historicity of Genesis
The word Genesis means ‘beginnings’ or even ‘origin’. The book of our origins was written long before Darwin and it’s the beginning of the Bible. The Bible is full of prophecy and history and it has proven itself to be very consistent and precise I’ve heard some preachers call the Bible a ‘perfect book’ and I can’t say I disagree. Jesus and The apostles refer to the Genesis account many times in the New Testament so it’s clear they must have regarded as history. Almost all scientists before Darwin regarded it as history and conducted science with that world-view.

Postmodernity, Skepticism and Athiesm rising-religion/
The world today is Postmodern, Post-Christian in a lot of ways. Atheism and skepticism seem to be on the rise. The National Geographic article: The World’s Newest Major Religion: No Relgion says:
“The religiously unaffiliated, called “nones,” are growing significantly. They’re the second largest religious group in North America and most of Europe. In the United States, nones make up almost a quarter of the population. In the past decade, U.S. nones have overtaken Catholics, mainline protestants, and all followers of non-Christian faiths.”

After the Protestant Reformation officially began in 1517 with Martin Luther’s legendary 95 theses, the Catholic Church got quick to work on a Counter-Reformation. The Council of Trent and the establishment of the Jesuit Order in 1534 started off a massive military effort to reeducate the Protestant World. Starting with schools of thought such as higher criticism of the divine revelation of scriptures. This Counter-Reformation has done everything it can to make sure you and your kids don’t believe in the Creator and the blessings he promised you. They want to make sure you think your an animal so they can keep you like a slave. I often remind my atheist friends that atheistic, humanistic governments killed over 150 million people in the 20th century and the Protestants started free civilization. Many of these indoctrinated people are not interested in history of philosophy they believe that science is where we get truth and that’s the only place it can be found.

Scientific Method – Uses and Limits
It’s very important for us to understand just what the scientific method is and what it is not. Ess entially the Scientific Method is a number of steps that lead us to a conclusion. These steps are such: 1 Ask a question 2 Do research and form hypothesis 3 Do experiments in order to observe your hypothesis 4 study the data from the experiment and come to a conclusion. Essentially the scientific method does not prove anything it provides one with
a working theory that could be disproven or improved upon tomorrow.

Since science is such an amazing thing as to make us deny our creator let us ask what is science? Returning to In Six Days, an article by scientist Jeremy L. Walter:
“Science is the human enterprise of seeking to describe accurately and quantitatively the nature and processes of our universe through observation, hypothesis, and experimental validation. Certain axiomatic principles must be accepted by faith for this method to be valid, the first of which is the expectation of order in the universe. A specific corollary of the order principle is the law of causality or “cause and effect” relationships. This law states that one cause can have many effects, but no effect can be quantitatively greater of qualitatively superior to its cause. Observed effects are assumed to have cause occurences. The inquisitive mind will speculate on the cause of an observed effect and then seek to recreate and test the cause experimentally. That is the essence of the so called scientific method.”

This is passage From Gordon Clark’s Work: “The Philosophy of Science and the Belief in God”
Karl Popper has written several books on the philosophy of science in which he argues that science, rather than consisting of a body of proven truths as many believe, consists of nothing but guesses and refuted guesses. Popper writes:
‘First, although in science we do our best to find the truth, we are conscious of the fact that we can never be sure whether we have got it… We know that our scientific theories always remain hypotheses…In science there is no ‘knowledge’, in the sense in which Plato and Aristotle understood the word, in the sense which implies finality; in science, we never have sufficient reason for the belief that we have attained truth…Einstein declared that his theory was false, he said that it would be a better approximation to the truth that Newton’s, but he gave reasons why he would not, even if all predictions came out right, regard it as a true theory [Popper Selections, edited by David Miller, Princeton University Press, 1985, 90, 91, 121; emphasis is Popper’s].

A Perfect example of the scientific method at work in an everyday situation would be something like this: When it rains the sidewalk becomes wet, if the sidewalk is wet then it must have rained. The question is why is the sidewalk wet? This is answered when rain is observed. Then the assumption becomes that sidewalks become wet from rain. If we wait for it to rain the sidewalk will be wet thus proving our hypothesis true.

Bertrand Russell a famous English writer and Statesman said this about Inductive arguments in his 1931 work “The Scientific Outlook’ (pg 77) :
“All inductive arguments in the last resort reduce themselves to the following form: ‘If this is true, that is true: now that is true, therefore this is true.” This argument is, of course, formally fallacious. Suppose I were to say: ‘If bread is a Stone and stones are nourishing, then this bread will nourish ; now this bread does nourish me ; therefore it is a stone and stones are nourishing. If I were to advance such an argument, I should certainly be thought foolish, yet it would not be fundamentally different from the arguments upon which all scientific laws are based.”


Natural Selection
Wikipedia defines Natural Selection as:
“…the differential survival and reproduction of individuals due to differences in phenotype. It is a key mechanism of evolution, the change in heritable traits of population over time. Charles Darwin popularized the term Natural Selection. He compared it with artificial selection, which is intentional, whereas natural selection is not.

Natural selection assumes there is not intelligent design involved in the furtherance of the species. Furthermore, most scientists agree that the changes that occur happen at random. Natural selection relies heavily on mutations of cells in order for the species to evolve or improve, This is a huge problem for the evolutionary theory as mutations are almost always a very bad thing.

Mutations Never Good
From the Book “Not By Chance” by Dr. Lee Spetner “But in all the reading I’ve done in the life sciences literature, I’ve never found a mutation that added information… All point mutations that have been studied on the molecular level turn out to reduce the genetic information and not to increase it.”

Stephen Jay Gould states in his 1989 work “Wonderful Life, The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History” that even if evolutionary history on earth repeated itself a million times, he doubts whether anything like homo sapiens would ever develop again.


The complexity of life is an astounding thing. To entertain the idea that intelligent life arose from chance mutations that selected positive traits over a very long period of time becomes very unnlikely in light of the facts. Let’s examine the building blocks of life:

RNA, DNA, and Proteins. These are the building blocks of our human bodies.

In the work “In Six Days: why fifty scientists choose to believe in creation’ Science educator Jerry R. Bergman quotes scientist Hickman
“Cells are the fabric of life. Even the most primitive cells are enormously complex structures that form basic units of all living matter. All tissues and organs are composed of cells interact, each performing its specialized role in an organized community. In single-celled organisms all the functions of life are performed within the confines of the microscopic package. There is no life without Cells”

Bergman goes on…

“Even most bacteria require sev,eral thousand genes to carry out the functions necessary for life. E. Coli has about 4, 639,221 nucleotide base pairs, which code for 4,288 genes, each one of which produces an enormously complex protein machine.”

From J. W. Porters work “Evolution a Menace” :
“Lord Kelvin, of England, who, at the time of his death, a few years since, was perhaps, the worlds greatest scientist, said: ‘It is not in dead matter that men live, move and have their being; but in creative and direct power, which science compels to accept as an article of faith. Is there anything so absurd as to believe that a number of atoms, by falling together of their own account, could make crystal, a microbe, or a living animal?’”

Evidence of Irreducible Complexity
The Trilobite is said to be one of the earliest group of arthropods and the complexity of this creature is insane. Biologist Andrew Snelling says this about the Trilobites:
“Indeed, some scientists believe that the aggregate eyes of some trilobites were the most sophisticated optical system ever utilized by any organism. The shizochroal eye is a compound eye, made up of many single lenses, each specifically designed to correct for sherical aberration, thus allowing the trilobites to see an undistorted image under water. The elegant physical design of trilobite eyes also employs Fermat’s principle, Abbe’s sine law, Snell’s law of refraction, and compensates for the optics of birefringent crystals. Such vision system has all the evidence of being constructed by an exceeding brilliant designer!
The trilobite’s extraordinary complexity hardly warrants the creature being called primative, but herein lies the dilemma for evolutionists. There are no possible evolutionary ancestors to the trilobites in the rock layers beneath where the trilobites are found, for example, in the Grand Canyon. In fact, the trilobites appear in the geological record suddenly, fully-formed and complexly integrated creatures with the most sophisticated optical systems every utilized by any organism, without any hint or trace of an ancestor in the many rock layers beneath. There is absolutley no clue as to how the amazing complexity of trilobites arose, and thus they quite clearly argue for design and fiat creation, just as we would predict from the biblical account in Genesis.”

Birds also display evidence for irreducible complexity. Dr. of Mathematics Andrew Macintosh has this to say:
“Bird’s wings are made of feathers. A Feather is a marvel of light-weight engineering. Though light, it is very wind resistant. This is because there is a clever system of barbs and barbules. Each barb of a feather is visible to the naked eye and comes off the main stem. What is not generally realized is that on either side of the barb are further tiny barbules which can only be seen under a microscope. These are of different types, depending on whether they are coming from one side of the barb or the other. On one side of the barb, ridged barbule will emerge, while on the other side, the barbules will have hooks. Thus, the hooks coming out of one barb will connect with ridges reaching in the opposite direction from a neighboring barb. The hooks and ridges act velcro, but go one stage further, since the ridges allow a sliding joing, and there is thus an ingenious mechanism for keeping the surface flexible and yet in tact.”

He says later on…

“As one might expect, however, the story does not end there either, for a bird can fly only because it also has an exceedingly light bone structure, which is achieved by the bones being hollow. Many birds maintain skeleton strength by cross members within the hollow bones. Such an arrangement began to be used in the middle of the century for aircraft wings and is termed the “Warrens’s truss arrangement.” Large birds, such as an eagle or a vulture, would simply break into pieces in midair if there were some supposed halfway stage in the skeletal development where they had not yet developed such cross members in their bones.”

The Law of Causality holds that there has to be a first cause for things to happen, especially concerning the creation and existence of humans. The Christian causality is very simply what is written in the Bible, that God, the Creator did it. But the Naturalistic view is much more difficult and mysterious. To believe in naturalistic evolution one would ultimately have to believe in Abiogenesis; that life somehow came from non life. This would be a huge leap of faith but people who call themselves scientific or empirical do every day and never think twice. The Basic assumptions of the Naturalist position is that life came from non-life and that all life is related back to some long ago ancestor.

Bergman says “The idea that life can come from non-life is called abiogenesis, which is assumed by evolutionists to have occurred only once or a few times at most in earth history. This conclusion is not a result of evidence, but is obtained because the current dominant world view in Western science, naturalism (athiesm) require a chance spontaneous origin of life. The naturalistic view requires a set of unknown conditions to have existed in the distant past that operated to produce the fist “living thing”.”

Bergman goes on to quote the famous astronomer Fred Hoyle,
“There is not a shred of objective evidence to support the hypothesis that life began in an organic soup here on the earth. Indeed, Francis Crick, who shared a Nobel prize for the discovery of the structure of DNA, is one biophysicist who finds this theory unconvincing. So why do biologists indulge in unsubstantiated fantasies in order to deny what is so patently obvious, that the 200,000 amino acid chains, and hence life, did not appear by chance?
The answer lies in a theory developed over a century ago, which sought to explain the development of life as an inevitable product of the purely local natural process. It’s author, Charles Darwin, hesitated to challenge the church’s doctrine on the creation, and publicly as least did not trace the implications of his ideas back to their bearing on the origin of life. However, he privately suggested that life itself may have been produced in “some warm little pond”, and to this day his followers have sought to explain the origin of terrestrial life in terms of a process of checmical evolution from the primordial soup. But, as we have seen, this theory simply does not fit the facts. (Hoyle, 1983, p.23)”

The Laws of Thermodynamics causes a lot of problems for the Naturalist world view. The first law is called the law of conservation maintains that the amount of energy available in the universe is at a constant and energy can’t be created or destroyed only transformed. The second Law states that net increase in entropy will result in a final stable equilibrium where all processes cease.

Professor of mechanical engineering John M. Cimbala says this about it:
“Now consider the entire universe as one giant closed system. Stars are hot, just like the cup of coffee, and are cooling down, losing energy into space. The hot stars in cooler space represent a state of available energy, just like the hot coffee in the room. However, the second law of thermodynamics requires that this available energy constantly change to unavailable energy. In another analogy, the entire universe is winding down like a giant wind up clock, ticking down and losing available energy. Since energy is continually changing from available to unavailable, someone had to give it available energy in the beginning. Who or what could have produced energy in an available state in the first place? Only someone or something not bound by the second law of thermodynamics. Only the creator of the second law of thermodynamics could violate it and create energy in a state of availability in the first place.”

This brings me to the point of the differences between the Antediluvian and Postdiluvian worlds. An online article called Did more oxygen and pressure in the pre-flood world have health benefits? says: “Modern scientific discoveries may give us some clues as to why the pre-flood world was so different. Scientists have discovered air bubbles that have been trapped in fossilized amber (tree sap). As the tree sap rolled down the side of the tree, it captured the atmosphere in these air bubbles, which when analyzed reveals an earlier atmosphere had about 35 percent oxygen compared to today’s 21 percent.

In addition to the increased oxygen, other studies have suggested that there was a greater air pressure as well. New Scientist magazine, which comes from an evolutionary perspective, explains:

One implication is that the atmospheric pressure of the Earth would have been much greater during the Cretaceous Era, when the bubbles formed in the resin. A dense atmosphere could also explain how the ungainly pterosaur, with its stubby body and wingspan of up to 11 meters, could have stayed airborne. The spread of angiosperms, flowering plants, during the Cretaceous era could have caused the high oxygen levels.”

Just as a side note, higher levels of oxygen would be incredibly detrimental to the ‘evolutionary primordial soup’ theory as oxygen is very destructive.

Oxygen double edged sword we need it we breathe it but it can also kill us Tells us:
“Neurons in the brain are especially energy sensitive, and even minutes of oxygen starvation lead to rapid neuron death.

“On the other hand, as a moment’s reflection reveals, oxygen is extremely corrosive. A fine new automobile, left to the mercies of oxygen, will eventually rust down to a pile of dust. Oxygen spoils food, turns butter rancid, even eats the granite in our grandest mountains. Given the slightest opportunity, moreover, oxygen will burn to cinders anything flammable.

Another major problem with the theory of evolution is the complete and utter lack of transitional species in the fossil record. Darwin himself was well aware of this and even admitted it in his famous work Origin of Species:
“Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection that be urged against my theory.”

Piltdown Man

Piltdown man is another devastating blow the credibility of the Theory of Evolution, the Evolutionary paradigm and the scientific community in general. From a article titled: Piltdown Man Hoax, 100 Years Ago:
“On December 18, 1912, at a packed meeting of the U.K.’s Geological Society, amateur archaeologist Charles Dawson and Arthur Smith Woodward of the British Museum announced findings that caused a sensation around the world. After a three-year excavation of the Piltdown gravel pit in Sussex, England, Dawson had unearthed human-like skull fragments and a jaw with two teeth, along with a variety of animal fossils and primitive stone tools. Dawson and Woodward announced that one of the skulls and the jaw belonged to a primitive hominid, or human ancestor, who lived some 500,000 to 1 million years ago. The scientific community celebrated Dawson’s discovery as the long-awaited “missing link” between ape and man and the confirmation of Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution. As the decades passed and new information came to light, however, it became clear that the Piltdown Man was not what he seemed.

By the time of Dawson and Woodward’s historic announcement, the search for a missing link to prove Darwin’s still-controversial theory had grown intense. Significant evidence of early humans in the British Isles had not yet been found, and the success of the Sussex dig was a major headline-grabber. Woodward, who was the curator of the British Museum’s paleontology department, dubbed the discovery Eoanthropus dawsoni, or “Dawson’s Dawn-man,” but he was more commonly known as the Piltdown Man.

The first doubts about Piltdown Man’s legitimacy surfaced in the 1920s and ’30s, with the discovery of other early human remains around the world (such as the Taung skull in South Africa, now known as Australopithecus). None of them showed the large brain and ape-like jaw of Piltdown Man; instead, they suggested that jaws and teeth became human-like before a large brain evolved. New dating technology based on fluorine testing emerged in 1939, but the Piltdown remains had been locked away after Dawson’s death in 1916 and were not extensively tested until a decade later. At that time, fluorine testing revealed that the remains were a good deal younger than had previously been claimed, closer to 50,000 than 500,000 years old. (Later, carbon-dating technology showed that the skull was actually no more than 600 years old.)

But that wasn’t all: Upon closer examination of the Piltdown Man, scientists found that the presumed hominid’s skull and jaw actually originated from two different species, a human and an ape (possibly an orangutan). A microscope revealed that the teeth within the jaw had been filed down to make them look more human, and that many of the remains from the Piltdown site appeared to have been stained to match each other as well as the gravel where they were supposedly found. In November 1953, authorities of the British Natural History Museum announced these findings and publicly called Piltdown Man a fraud.”

There is evidence that a Jesuit named Pierre Teilhard de Chardin had connections with Dawson and this man could have played a role in perpetrating this fraud to help buttress the theory of evolution and the naturalistic world view. I’m not going to go into that here but I’ll include all information in the description of this video.


This article from Scientific America called – Baffling Genetic Barrier Prevents Similar Animals From Interbreeding admits that a tiny change in DNA creates a completely separate species that is reproductively exclusive to its own kind.

“In new research published in June in the journal Science, Wolf’s team has found that a surprisingly small chunk of DNA may hold the answer. A comparison of the carrion and hooded-crow genomes showed that the sequences are almost identical. Differences in just 82 DNA letters, out of a total of about 1.2 billion, appear to separate the two groups.

Almost all of them are clustered in a small part of one chromosome. “Maybe just a few genes make a species what they are,” said Chris Jiggins, a biologist at the University of Cambridge in England, who was not involved in the study. “Maybe the rest of genome can flow, so species are much more fluid than we imagined before.”

The findings are striking because they suggest that just a few genes can keep two populations apart. Something within that segment of DNA stops black crows from mating with gray ones and vice versa, creating a tenuous mating barrier that could represent one of the earliest steps in the formation of new species. “They look very different and prefer to mate with their own kind, and all of that must be controlled by these narrow regions,” Jiggins said.

Problems With Radiometric Dating
Radiometric dating has been used for finding out how old a particular fossil or rock is but Radiometric dating has a few issues, namely the fact that it’s effectiveness is built upon a number of assumptions as is most science as we’ve seen. Dr. Walter Veith in his work The Genesis Conflict goes into some detail on this issue.

“A radioactive element is capable of changing into a new element by the emission of a charged particle. The parent isotope is thus transformed into a daughter particle. This process will continue until a stable element is produced. The rates of decay vary from elemt to element and the rate is measured in half-lives. For example, if an element has a half-life of 5730 years, as is the case for carbon-14, then after 5730 years, only have the original amount of carbon-14 will be left in any non-living-carbon-containing object after this time period. In order to determine the age of a substance, it is vital that the amount of parent element and its daughter product together with the half-life criteria then enables one to calculate the age of the sample. Of course, one can only determine the quantity of the parent element in the present sample; the quantity of the parent element in the past must be estimated. Knowing the decay rates and using the assumption these decay rates have remained constant over time, the age of the material can be determined. In other words, all methods of radioactive dating rely on some a priori assumptions, which may not necessarily be true. These are:

1. The rate of radioactive decay and half-lives has remained constant over time. This assumption has the backing of numerous scientific studies and is relatively sound; however, conditions may have been different in the past and could have influenced the rate of decay or formation of elements.

2. The assumption that the clock was set to zero when the study material was formed. This requires that only the parent isotope be initially present or that the amount of daughter isotope present at the beginning is known so that it can be subtracted.

3. The assumption that we are dealing with a closed system. No loss of either parent of daughter elements has occurred since the study material formed.

Dr. Walter Veith in The Genesis Conflict tells us that the Mesozoic period ends with massive extinction that coincides with the catastrophism model. Many of the species that lived then are still alive and much the same today as well. As a matter of fact there is more evidence if devolution as apposed to evolution because many species were bigger and even more complex in the Antediluvian world.

Evidence for the flood
Dr. Walter Veith gives us a couple compelling geological evidences for the flood in his work The Genesis Conflict:

1. Massive fossil graveyards with evidence of plants and animals being washed into position.

2. Huge Sedimentary deposits (nearly three quarters of the earth’s exposed surface is covered with sedimentary rock deposits.)

3. The chalk deposits of the world are universal. Chalk is formed from the skeletons of marine unicellular protozoans and algae, and can only settle out of relatively shallow water. In deep oceans, the calcium carbonate shells dissolve on the way down to the floor. The chalk deposits are thus an indication of worldwide coverage of a relatively shallow sea. Chalk deposits of the same age are found in many areas of North America, Australia, Europe, Asia, and Africa, and all of these deposits are resting on the same type of glauconitic sandstone. For these factors to be so universal the same conditions must have existed universally.

4. The vast coal and oil fields of the world are further evidence of a vast flood catastrophe. No process occurring today can even remotely approach the magnitude of the catastrophe necessary to account for such a vast scale of universal burial of plants and other organic material.

Geologist Andrew Snelling gives us more evidence for catastrophism in his essay from In Six Days…

“There is impressive evidence that fossil deposits and rock strata were formed catastrophically. There are also many indications that there were not millions of years, or even thousands, between various rock units. The rock sequence in the Grand Canyon is a case in point. Not only can it be shown that each of the rock units exposed in the walls of the canyon must have formed very rapidly under catastrophic water conditions, but there are not significant time gaps between the various rock layers. Thus, the total time involved to put in place some 4,000 feet thickness of rock strata is well within the time constraints the Bible stipulates for the flood event.
What is also spectacular about the Grand Canyon area in northern Arizona is the scale and magnitude of the rock units and the awesomeness of the canyon itself. One can physically walk up and down the sequence of rock units that go back before the Flood, and then right through the Flood event up until post-Flood time. While the sequence is not complete, there are a few places where such a complete sequence is not complete, there are a few places where such a complete sequence is so fully exposed and so much evidence for the Flood and its catastrophic nature.
No geologist denies that the oceans once covered the land, since rocks containing marine fossils may be found at elevations about sea level today anywhere from one to five miles…”

It’s well known that Charles Darwin was a Mason. Anyone who has studied the Masons and secret societies know what they are really all about. Charles grandfather Erasmus Darwin had done work on the theory of evolution as well. The theory of evolution is nothing new even Aristotle thought life had come about by way of natural process. The freemasons and Counter-Reformation stooges have used science to turn historically Protestant America into an atheist, socialist-communist hellhole ripe for a political dictatorship. Charles Darwin was just another one of their stooges.

Darwin’s popular theory has effected history in a massive way. Eugenics was inspired by the Darwinian paradigm because Darwinism believes in a superior race, one that is more evolved than the rest, which helped to inspire Nazism in a big way.

The Jesuit priest Muckerman was one who published work in Germany before WWII called Eugenic. These ideas would ultimately lead to the enslavement and death of some 6 million people in concentration camps. The Jesuit of the short robe Dr. Mengele and all the torturous evil experiments he did with the little Jewish children, these men will come up with any excuse to butcher people if it can’t be religious then it will have to be scientific, after all, science seems to be the new modern religion anyway.

The Church is dead because most people believe they are evolved monkeys flying though infinite space on a spinning ball therefore the Bible is a dead book to them and the whole idea of creation is childish.

Moral relativism has taken over where the Golden rule and 10 commandments once stood strong. The family unit is collapsing as equalitarian beliefs destroy the natural roles of men and women because women are too busy evolving into goddesses or something to be a mother and keep a house hold.

The fabric of society that was built by the Reformation and higher learning is being torn apart because people have refused to learn the truth about their creator.

I want to thanks you for listening to my presentation on the many problems with the theory of evolution. I want to remind everyone to make sure subscribe to this channel, and hit the bell for updates, like this video, share this video, if you would like to get ahold of me email me at Please consider making a donating to me at my paypal link in the description I would greatly appreciate that. Thanks everyone for the support and until Next time God Bless you All!




Institutional Pedophilia is NOT a Conspiracy Theory

And whosoever shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me, it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea.

Mark 9:42


Ever since the breaking of the Pizzagate story and the total cover-up by the Mainstream Media, political pedophilia as a possibility has been introduced to everyone.  Although most who follow the ‘Mainstream paradigm’ have dismissed this as raving ‘conspiracy theory’ those of us who study these things know better than to dismiss an idea or story just because CNN told us to.

Child Trafficking symbols:

 Pizzagate symbols

Independent Researchers

Many YouTubers have taken it upon themselves to do meticulous research into the personal social media pages of some of the elite families such as Rockefeller’s and Rothschild’s for clues and signs concerning child abuse and pedophilia.  Although there are many other people doing the same thing I’ve linked these videos to give you an idea of the dedication these independent researchers have due to the complete lack of action on the part of the authorities who are themselves complicit and covering up for their elite masters.

Pedophilia = Political Control

Personally, I’ve studied this issue for some time now, almost 5 years and I’ve been privy the REALITY of political pedophilia.  Firstly, if you even have a cursory understanding of the writings of Adam Weishaupt, the ex-Jesuit priest gone Illuminist Masonic Craft Master, you will know that sexual perversion is a great tool used in intelligence circles to control.  You see, once you’ve established ‘dirt’ on someone it’s much easier to make them do it your way, this is a core controlling principle of the Illuminati and today it’s pedophilia, big time.  Here’s a hero of the completely naive liberals, Devout Roman Catholic, Jesuit trained Joe Biden assaulting a girl and being a regular creep toward many other people:

Adam Weishaupt

The Kinsey Syndrome

For America, we can look back to Alfred Kinsey and his gang of malicious, conscious-less, NAZI pedophiles to see the beginnings of a sexual revolution.  One which would ultimately culminate in the mass confusion that we are experiencing today: the insanity of transgenderism, same-sex marriage (marriage is to make a family, man and woman), normalizing pedophilia (NAMBLA), normalizing bestiality and a host of others.  The extensive documentary ‘The Kinsey Syndrome’ is a very good expose of this man and his government/Rockefeller funding.  This man literally hired pedophiles, one of which was a NAZI (Fritz von Balluseck), and had them record data from their experiences and report it back to him so he could amass data for The Kinsey Report and subsequently use that date to change laws regarding sex.  Author/activist Drake Shelton has written a book called The Myth of Gender Equality covering this issue very well.

Jimmy Savile

In more recent times, in England, we’ve seen the Jimmy Savile drama play out.  Jimmy Savile was truly a trickster, a very sneaky man that got away with everything even until the end, he even admitted it himself in his last interview ever.

There you have it folks, Jimmy told us himself, he’s a tricky guy and he got away with all of it Scot free. Savile had it all, he was at the top of the social pyramid in his day and he used it to it’s fullest.  He was even in charge of a psychiatric hospital called Broadmoor where he abused many people.  He even had a personal apartment on the premise, putting the insane in charge of the nut house you could say.

Edward Heath/9th Circle

The late Prime minister Edward Heath was known to be very close to Savile and a pedophile, this is a very  good video documentaries concerning Heath and a Satanic child sacrifice organization called the 9th circle:

Savile was also known to be very close to British Royalty and of course the Pope.  He was a member of at least 3 knighthoods including Knights of the British Empire and the Knights of Malta.

Savile and John Paul II
Savile with his popish master
Savile and Prince Philip
Savile with his pedophile and fellow Knight buddy, Prince Philip

The Killer Queen

Of course the Queen and her fellow slimy, scaly family members have been accused of crimes against younglings making off with 10 children who were never seen again at an English school and there are many folks doing great work of exposing the British Crown for it’s disgusting crimes against humanity especially regarding pedophilia:

The evil Queen with here Maltese Cross displayed (Dame of Malta, Popes Servant)

Jesuit Pope

The current Pope is also deeply involved in this massive pedophile cult.  The International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State has published this regarding Papal as well as Royal involvement in child trafficking rings among other abominable things:

Pope Francis
Ex-Grand Argentine Inquisitor gone Pope Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Francis I)
common law against pope queen.jpg
“We have enough evidence to prosecute and hold both the Prime Minister and the Queen of England” said ex-Royal Military Policeman Matt Taylor.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Francis I) has a very dark history as Archbishop of Buenos Aires and Jesuit Provincial of Argentina.  He essentially was in charge of the Inquisition in Argentina during a military dictatorship called ‘The Dirty War’ in which 30,000 people were cut, burned, flayed, poisoned, tortured, kidnapped and/or killed (Jesuit Oath).

Jesuit oath
The very real and very relevant Jesuit Extreme Oath which defines the Counter-Reformation against Protestantism which has provided everyone in the secular word with it’s freedoms.

There are two documentaries that I would strongly recommend you watching about Bergoglios past (Francis I):

Argentina itself is known to have been very sympathetic toward the German NAZI cause and harbored many Nazis after the war such as Joseph Mengele who himself was a devout Roman Catholic and trained by none other than the Jesuit fathers.

Joseph Mengele
God only knows how many children were targeted by these horrible pedophiles in the camps.

The Franklin Cover-up

The Franklin Cover-up by ex U.S. Senator John DeCamp was another major red pill for the Americans that they better wake up to the fact that their politicians are all compliant and silent about the massive pedophile rings leading right to the White House.

John Decamp
MUST READ                    John DeCamp exposes political pedophilia in 92′ and people still argue that’s it’s just a ‘conspiracy theory’ (facepalm)

The documentary The Conspiracy of Silence, chronicling DeCamps journalism was to air on the Discover Channel in 94′ but was taken off the air by some very powerful men.  The documentary goes into detail about a Catholic Orphanage called Boys Town that was used as a child whore house by Catholic priests who run it and of course Jimmy Savile was honorary guest there.  Check it out:

Just Down the Street

Articles like this remind us that we never really know who our neighbors are.  A man named Colin Batley was fingered by Welsh authorities as running a satanic sex cult out of a cul-de-sac.

The Pedophile, Wannabe wizard Colin Batley.  Truly Evil, manipulative, mind controller, and sexual predator.

Why Children?

“For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim”

–Aleister Crowley

al crowley
‘The Beast 666’

This may or may not surprise you depending on your level of knowledge concerning occult beliefs.  However, the reason that these people become obsessed with sex with children is because they derive great power from it, or so they believe.  Believe it or not, the rite of sodomy is very ancient and it can be used for trauma based mind control and/or demon possession.  This site goes into more detail about the rites of sodomy:

Aleister Crowley was no doubt incredibly influential to the secular world especially in the form of rock n roll.  Crowley’s religion of Thelema was based on the idea that you should be able to do whatever you want to do without restrain coining the famous maxim ‘Do as thou Wilt’.  This was so you could cast off restraints and be your truly liberated self, maybe even become a god.  Crowley’s message was picked up and widely embraced by the music world, here are some examples.

al crowley sgt peppers face.jpg
Some Beatles fans might get butthurt but your boys were into the occult and they were disciples of Aleister Crowley.
Savile glasses
Jimmy Savile was very close with the Beatles and the Rolling Stones
john lennon
John Lennon is said to have adopted his famous glasses from Savile’s style
Al Crowley David Bowie
David Bowie emulating Crowley who is emulating an Egyptian Pharaoh
Al Crowley Jay Z
Rapper and destroyer of morals and conscious of the youth Jay-Z promoting the nihilistic Crowley teaching of “Do as Thou Wilt”
The Masonic, sellout, creepy, pedophiles, and wizard wannabes that are The Rolling Stones on their album “His Satanic Majesties”.

Children’s Blood

Another reason that children are so important to the rich ruling elites is because their blood is literally the fountain of youth.  Check out this Gawker article for more info:


This issue of institutional pedophilia should get everyone with a conscious completely triggered and outraged.  We the people spend too much damn time whining and complaining about race and sex too long to even bring this topic to the table and when it is brought before a mass audience such as in the case of pizzagate it gets shot down as ‘conspiracy theory’ and everyone goes on with their lives thinking political pedophilia is too fantastic.  It’s time we stop being childish and get involved with exposing the pedo rings that are used as leverage to control our ‘elected’ SELECTED officials and try to help these children.  We were all children at one time and the thought that this goes on all day every day should be enough to get everyone involved in taking these people down.

I’m out,